On 12/14/21 6:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 19:03, Vivek Goyal <vgo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:54:20AM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>>> Hi Vivek,
>>>
>>> Besides, I'd like to know that, to make the per inode DAX feature merged
>>> into v5.17, shall the patches for virtiofsd also be ready during the
>>> merge window?
>>
>> I think having virtiofsd patches ready is not a strict requirement to
>> merge kernel patches. I will provide my ack for the kernel patches.
>> After that it is up to the Miklos to accept or reject those patches.
>
> Pushed to fuse.git#for-next.
>
> The user API needed porting, the userspace part will have to take that
> into account. The only other change I did was replace the !!
> construct with a (bool) cast.
Hi, what do you mean by 'The user API needed porting'? Do you mean this
patch set for virtiofsd?
--
Thanks,
Jeffle
_______________________________________________
Virtio-fs mailing list
Virtio-fs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs