Hi team, I've done some tests to virtio-fs and virtio-blk. The conditions are: 1. same buffered read workload. 2. --cache=always for virtiofs The result is virtio-blk costs only half time to finish the job than virtio-fs, why is that in terms of they are both just memory access?(I do one extra test first to load the workload to memory) --- https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd/-/issues/66
_______________________________________________ Virtio-fs mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs
