On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 11:22 +0200, Goran Mekić wrote: > Hello, > > There's an update for swtpm and I submitted > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273199. My first > question is if phabricator is preferred for this port? I'm OK with > submitting it on either place, so whatever is easier. >
Merged. You're the maintainer of the port. So, it's up to you. > With updated port there's also support for CUSE, which would allow > swtpm > to be used with pass-through. The problem is that socket and CUSE > have > problems which I described in upstream issue: > https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/issues/820. If there are any > suggestions how to fix that fuse error, I'd like to hear them and try > and fix it. > > Regards, > meka > -- Kind regards, Corvin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
