---> BTW, I think what you are saying already exists and macOS is exactly that: the FreeBSD core and the mach microkernel.
Please don't compare FreeBSD to MacOS. On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:33 PM Alejandro Imass <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:29 PM Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmailcom> > wrote: > >> Alejandro,I'm not sure if you are aware that the discussion at a certain >> point has broadened and deepened. I don't understand why I can't propose >> an alternative to the actual jail and jail managers that you are talking >> about. And no. On the L4 website there is a userland based on new versions >> of Ubuntu and Debian that can be used with the microkernel offered. They >> also say that FreeBSD can be compiled,too,using the same technique used to >> build the Linux userland proposed. If you want to talk about containers,why >> not also add the microkernel topic,that's not a container,but its working >> can be compared to the microservices offered by Linux and FreeBSD if they >> run with a microkernel. >> >> > Never said you can't propose it, it just seems off-topic to this thread. > Maybe start a new thread on microkernel versus X. > This thread is about containers and container configuration, auto-scaling, > discovery, updating and monitoring, etc. > > What I usually do in this case is start a new thread with a new subject > and (was: xxx). > That way, people interested in that branch of the discussion can continue > on its own topic, and the mail archives can do a better job for later > research. > > BTW, I think what you are saying already exists and macOS is exactly that: > the FreeBSD core and the mach microkernel. > > Best, > > -- > Alex > -- Mario.
