On Wednesday 28 March 2007 21:18, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 March 2007 00:13, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >   
> >> smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete
> >> duplicates of the same logic.  This patch combines them by
> >> implementing them in terms of the more general
> >> smp_call_function_mask().
> >>     
> >
> > I think I got those already.
> >   
> 
> OK.  Do you have smp_ops and machine_ops?

Not yet. Can you resend the current set?

> There's a doc update patch too:

Can you send that separately after i sync out please?

Thanks

-Andi
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to