On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 10:02 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Reasonable.  I think we would have fewer people to yell at if we
> restructured things a bit. 

Sure ... propose a restructure and I'll see if I can fit into it.  All
voyager really needs is to subvert the entirey of the SMP layer (not
being APIC based it needs a complete rewrite of most smp_ function)  It
also needs some minor things in setup (like catbus config probes and
memory setup).

> The fact that we have prominent people deliberately ignoring voyager
> during development I find disturbing. 

Heh, I just got used to that ...

> In this case I just happened to stumble onto the problem while I was
> looking at something else, and decided it wasn't worth doing
> development on code that was broken to start with.

James


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to