Ben-Ami Yassour wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 13:08 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Amit Shah wrote: >> >>> This will be useful for acking irqs of assigned devices >>> >>> >>> >> And also for improving time drift tracking. >> >> Please make this more generic by having a list of callbacks. There >> could also be just one list, rather than one for the ioapic and one for >> the pic as implemented now. >> >> It may also make sense to filter the irq number before calling the >> callback rather than relying on the callback to ignore uninteresting irqs. >> >> > Avi, > > Did you mean something like the patch below? >
I did, and have something very similar queued. > How should we protect list accesses, should it be a new lock or an existing > one? > > kvm->lock for now. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
