On 10/27/2010 03:00 PM, Ian Molton wrote:
> On 19/10/10 11:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 10/19/2010 12:31 PM, Ian Molton wrote:
>
>>>> 2. should start with a patch to the virtio-pci spec to document what
>>>> you're doing
>>>
>>> Where can I find that spec?
>>
>> http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/virtio-spec/
>
> Ok, but I'm not patching that until theres been some review.
Well, I like to review an implementation against a spec.
>
> There are links to the associated qemu and guest OS changes in my
> original email.
>
>>> It doesnt, at present... It could be changed fairly easily ithout
>>> breaking anything if that happens though.
>>
>> The hypervisor and the guest can be changed independently. The driver
>> should be coded so that it doesn't depend on hypervisor implementation
>> details.
>
> Fixed - updated patch tested and attached.
> +
> + /* Transfer data */
> + if (virtqueue_add_buf(vq, sg_list, o_page, i_page, gldata)>= 0) {
> + virtqueue_kick(vq);
> + /* Chill out until it's done with the buffer. */
> + wait_for_completion(&gldata->done);
> + }
> +
Better, but still unsatisfying. If the server is busy, the caller would
block. I guess it's expected since it's called from ->fsync(). I'm not
sure whether that's the best interface, perhaps aio_writev is better.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
