>  static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> -     int tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->slock);
> +     struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
>  
> -     return !!(((tmp >> TICKET_SHIFT) ^ tmp) & ((1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - 1));
> +     return !!(tmp.tail ^ tmp.head);

Does it make sense to mask it here it here with TICKET_MASK as it was done 
before?
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to