On 2011-04-05 06:49, Takuma Umeya wrote:
> When virtio block device is removed, index does not get decremented. When 
> another virtio disk is attached it uses the next device letter to the 
> one that is suppose to be available. 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Takuma Umeya <tum...@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 6ecf89c..730e7af 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ static void __devexit virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device 
> *vdev)
>         mempool_destroy(vblk->pool);
>         vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>         kfree(vblk);
> +       index--;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {

What happens when you delete a device that isn't the last one?

-- 
Jens Axboe

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to