On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:34:32 +0800
"Peter Huang(Peng)" <peter.huangp...@huawei.com> wrote:
I searched from git-log, and found that until now we have vhost TX zero-copy
experiment feature, how
about RX zero-copy?
On 08/11/2012 04:55 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
There is no guarantee that packet will ever be read by receiver. This means
zero-copy could
create memory back pressure stalls.
It would be handy if this could be an optional feature, perhaps not
enabled by default due to the problem with stalls you mentioned. I would
love to see RX zero-copy implemented natively in KVM, as it might
alleviate the need for custom solutions like vPF_RING:
http://www.ntop.org/products/pf_ring/vpf_ring/
Every time a packet is copied, especially from kernel space to user
space, there is an opportunity for it to be dropped on its way to the
receiving application - which is unacceptable when monitoring high-speed
networks for security or bandwidth accounting purposes.
I am attempting to find a highly-efficient way to deploy virtualized
network monitoring sensors (Snort, for example). Ideally I want to
exploit symmetric hardware-based RSS and SR-IOV functionality for
load-balancing and packet distribution completely in ASIC. I've found
other existing work in this area (also using custom drivers) indicating
significant performance gains in the non-virtualized case:
http://www.ndsl.kaist.edu/~shinae/papers/TR-symRSS.pdf
Is there any interest in exploring native RX zero-copy within the
mainline KVM networking code?
Thanks,
Robert Vineyard
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
