On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:38:15 -0300
Rafael Aquini <aqu...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Memory fragmentation introduced by ballooning might reduce significantly
> the number of 2MB contiguous memory blocks that can be used within a guest,
> thus imposing performance penalties associated with the reduced number of
> transparent huge pages that could be used by the guest workload.
> 
> This patch-set follows the main idea discussed at 2012 LSFMMS session:
> "Ballooning for transparent huge pages" -- http://lwn.net/Articles/490114/
> to introduce the required changes to the virtio_balloon driver, as well as
> the changes to the core compaction & migration bits, in order to make those
> subsystems aware of ballooned pages and allow memory balloon pages become
> movable within a guest, thus avoiding the aforementioned fragmentation issue
> 
> Following are numbers that prove this patch benefits on allowing compaction
> to be more effective at memory ballooned guests.
> 
> Results for STRESS-HIGHALLOC benchmark, from Mel Gorman's mmtests suite,
> running on a 4gB RAM KVM guest which was ballooning 1gB RAM in 256mB chunks,
> at every minute (inflating/deflating), while test was running:

How can a patchset reach v10 and have zero Reviewed-by's?

The patchset looks reasonable to me and your empirical results look
good.  But I don't feel that I'm in a position to decide on its overall
desirability, either in a standalone sense or in comparison to any
alternative schemes which anyone has proposed.

IOW, Rusty and KVM folks: please consider thyself poked.

I looked through the code and have some comments which are minor in the
overall scheme of things.  I'll be more comfortable when a compaction
expert has had a go over it.  IOW, Mel joins the pokee list ;)

(The question of "overall desirability" is the big one here.  Do we
actually want to add this to Linux?  The rest is details which we can
work out).


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to