Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> We do have an alternate solution: masking out __GFP_HIGHMEM from the
>> kmalloc of desc.  If it fails, we will fall back to laying out the
>> virtio request directly inside the ring; if it doesn't fit, we'll wait
>> for the device to consume more buffers.
>
> Hmm, that will probably work for the vring but the zero-copy code for 9p may
> just give us an address from userspace if I'm understanding it correctly. In
> that case, we really have to do the translation as below (which is actually
> much cleaner because everything is page-aligned).
>
>> > @@ -325,7 +326,7 @@ static int p9_get_mapped_pages(struct virtio_chan 
>> > *chan,
>> >            int count = nr_pages;
>> >            while (nr_pages) {
>> >                    s = rest_of_page(data);
>> > -                  pages[index++] = virt_to_page(data);
>> > +                  pages[index++] = kmap_to_page(data);
>> >                    data += s;
>> >                    nr_pages--;
>> >            }
>
> So what do you reckon? How about I leave this hunk as a separate patch and
> have a play masking out __GFP_HIGHMEM for the vring descriptor?

Yes, I think so.  A scathing comment would be nice, too...

Thanks,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to