On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 05:51:44PM +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Dongsheng Song > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a > >>> while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the > >>> Linux kernel summit, remove it from any "depends on" lines in Kconfigs. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: Mukesh Rathor <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> > >>> --- > >>> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > >>> index 93ff4e1..8cada4c 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > >>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > >>> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS > >>> > >>> config XEN_X86_PVH > >>> bool "Support for running as a PVH guest (EXPERIMENTAL)" > >> > >> Why not remove this 'EXPERIMENTAL' too ? > > > > It was unclear to me if the feature was actually considered unstable. > > I can resend with the text removed from the title too, if that's the > > correct action here? > > > > -Kees > > > > If such a feature was considered unstable, it should depends on EXPERIMENTAL.
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is going away. > We should not surprised users. You should not have unstable options in the kernel in the first place, sorry. greg k-h _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
