Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > Il 20/06/2013 04:40, Rusty Russell ha scritto: >> Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: >>> Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>>>> 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >>>>>> specifically for net and block (note the new names). >>> >>> So why not a transport feature? Is it just because the SCSI commands >>> for virtio-blk also require a config space field? Sorry if I missed >>> this upthread. >> >> Mainly because I'm not sure that *all* devices are now safe. Are they? > > virtio-scsi's implementation in QEMU is not safe (been delaying that for > too long, sorry), but the spec is safe.
Then if we added a transport feature, we couldn't use it :( So I think it needs to be a per-device feature bit. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
