On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:32:36PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes: > > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> > > Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:00:32 +0300 > > > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:33:26PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > >>> From: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> > >>> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:13:25 +0930 > >>> > >>> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > >>> > > >>> > For small packets we can simplify xmit processing > >>> > by linearizing buffers with the header: > >>> > most packets seem to have enough head room > >>> > we can use for this purpose. > >>> > Since existing hypervisors require that header > >>> > is the first s/g element, we need a feature bit > >>> > for this. > >>> > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> > >>> > >>> I really think this has to wait until the next merge window, sorry. > >>> > >>> Please resubmit this when I open net-next back up, thanks. > >> > >> I assumed since -rc1 is out net-next is already open? > > > > -rc1 being released never makes net-next open. Instead, I explicitly > > open it up at some point in time after -rc1 when I feel that things > > have settled down enough. > > > > And when that happens, I announce so here. > > > > So you have to follow my announcements here on netdev to know > > when net-next is actually open. > > Thanks for letting me know. I'm sure that works well for others, but I > can't follow the mailing lists of every maintainer I deal with. > > Fortunately, you're the paragon for acking applied patches, so if I hit > this failure mode again I will know. > > Cheers, > Rusty.
In case you missed this, net-next opened Fri, 19 Jul 2013. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
