* Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com> wrote:
> >
> > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series.
> >
> > OK, I'll do. :)
> > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which
> > kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me
> > to post the series, linux-arch?
>
> I would add linux-arch.
>
> Note, you may need to support both ways for the current time being, as
> new __kprobes are being added (I've seen several in patches flying by in
> LKML).
We'd rather like to know about all cases where new code is added to
kprobes (or where we missed to consider some existing code).
It's really just a handful of annotations, the brunt of which is internal
to kprobes.
Thanks,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
