On 02/15, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > * Raghavendra K T <raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2015-02-15 11:25:44]: > > Resending the V5 with smp_mb__after_atomic() change without bumping up > revision
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> Of course, this needs the acks from maintainers. And I agree that SLOWPATH in .head makes xadd() in unlock() unavoidable. However I do not see how we can avoid the locked inc if we want to eliminate read-after-unlock. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
