On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:30:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I am inclined to say, for 4.10 let's revert > c7070619f3408d9a0dffbed9149e6f00479cf43b since what it fixes is not a > regression in 4.10.
No complaints there, as long as we can keep working to fix this for 4.11 and onwards. You'll also need to cc stable on the revert. > So I think we can defer the fix to 4.11. > I think we still want f7f6634d23830ff74335734fbdb28ea109c1f349 > for hosts with virtio 1 support. > > All this will hopefully push hosts to just implement virtio 1. > For mmio the changes are very small: several new registers, > that's all. You want this for proper 64 bit dma mask anyway. As I've said, virtio 1 will have exactly the same issue unless we start requiring firmware to advertise dma-coherent/_CCA for virtio-mmio devices correctly. Will _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
