On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:42:04 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com> wrote:
> Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic > failover infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com> Do what you want to other devices but leave netvsc alone. Adding these failover ops does not reduce the code size, and really is no benefit. The netvsc device driver needs to be backported to several other distributions and doing this makes that harder. I will NAK patches to change to common code for netvsc especially the three device model. MS worked hard with distro vendors to support transparent mode, ans we really can't have a new model; or do backport. Plus, DPDK is now dependent on existing model. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
