On Wed, 30 May 2018 20:03:11 -0700
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com> wrote:

> On 5/30/2018 7:06 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:14 -0700
> > Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic
> >> failover infrastructure.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com>  
> > Why was this merged? It was never signed off by any of the netvsc 
> > maintainers,
> > and there were still issues unresolved.
> >
> > There are also namespaces issues I am fixing and this breaks them.
> > Will start my patch set with a revert for this. Sorry  
> 
> I would appreciate if you can make the fixes on top of this patch series. I 
> tried hard
> to make sure that netvsc functionality and behavior doesn't change.
> 
> It is possible that there could be some bugs introduced, but they can be 
> fixed.
> Looks like Wei already found a bug and submitted a fix for that.
> 

Ok, but several of these may clash with what you want for virtio.
Like:
        - VF should be moved to namespace of virt device
        - VF should be associated based on message from host with serial # not
          registration notifier and MAC address.
        - control operations should use master device reference rather than
          searching based on MAC.

As you can see these are structural changes.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to