On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:25:22AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 20:33, Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Track whenever the virtio_gpu_object is already created (i.e. host knows > > about it) in a new variable. Add checks to virtio_gpu_object_attach() > > to do nothing on objects not created yet. > > > > Make virtio_gpu_ttm_bo_destroy() use the new variable too, instead of > > expecting hw_res_handle indicating the object state. > > Is there a potential patch ordering issue here? If this patch changes > the code to avoid using hw_res_handle, > is after patches that start filling in hw_res_handle in places we > haven't filled it in before. > Maybe this patch should happen earlier.
Didn't run into trouble in testing, but yes, it might be an issue in error paths. I'll reorder the patches. cheers, Gerd _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
