On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 02:12:30AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > All this ad hoc IS_DAX conditional logic is getting pretty nasty.
> > 
> > xfs_file_mmap(
> > ....
> > {
> >     struct inode    *inode = file_inode(filp);
> > 
> >     if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SYNC) {
> >             if (!IS_DAX(inode))
> >                     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >             if (!dax_synchronous(xfs_find_daxdev_for_inode(inode))
> >                     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >     }
> > 
> >     file_accessed(filp);
> >     vma->vm_ops = &xfs_file_vm_ops;
> >     if (IS_DAX(inode))
> >             vma->vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
> >     return 0;
> > }
> 
> Sure, this is better.

> > Even better, factor out all the "MAP_SYNC supported" checks into a
> > helper so that the filesystem code just doesn't have to care about
> > the details of checking for DAX+MAP_SYNC support....
> 
> o.k. Will add one common helper function for both ext4 & xfs filesystems.

Note this pending patch for Goldwyn Rodrigues' patchset for btrfs:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190328102418.5466-1-kilob...@angband.pl/

We might want to coordinate.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Did ya know that typing "test -j8" instead of "ctest -j8"
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ will make your testsuite pass much faster, and fix bugs?
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to