Hi all,

In an attempt to remove the remaining traces of [smp_]read_barrier_depends()
following my previous patches to strengthen READ_ONCE() for Alpha [1], I
ended up trying to decipher the read_barrier_depends() usage in the vhost
driver:

--->8

// drivers/vhost/vhost.c
static int get_indirect(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
                        struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_size,
                        unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
                        struct vhost_log *log, unsigned int *log_num,
                        struct vring_desc *indirect)
{
        [...]

        /* We will use the result as an address to read from, so most
         * architectures only need a compiler barrier here. */
        read_barrier_depends();

--->8

Unfortunately, although the barrier is commented (hurrah!), it's not
particularly enlightening about the accesses making up the dependency
chain, and I don't understand the supposed need for a compiler barrier
either (read_barrier_depends() doesn't generally provide this).

Does anybody know which accesses are being ordered here? Usually you'd need
a READ_ONCE()/rcu_dereference() beginning the chain, but I haven't managed
to find one...

Thanks,

Will

[1] c2bc66082e10 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit smp_read_barrier_depends() to 
READ_ONCE()")
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to