Hi Michael,

...back from holidays and still unsure what your preferred solution 
for the message layout would be:

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 02:32:43PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thanks for a review.
> 
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:44:15AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

[snip]

> > > > > +static int vhost_rpmsg_get_single(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +     struct vhost_rpmsg *vr = container_of(vq->dev, struct 
> > > > > vhost_rpmsg, dev);
> > > > > +     unsigned int out, in;
> > > > > +     int head = vhost_get_vq_desc(vq, vq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov), 
> > > > > &out, &in,
> > > > > +                                  NULL, NULL);
> > > > > +     if (head < 0) {
> > > > > +             vq_err(vq, "%s(): error %d getting buffer\n",
> > > > > +                    __func__, head);
> > > > > +             return head;
> > > > > +     }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     /* Nothing new? */
> > > > > +     if (head == vq->num)
> > > > > +             return head;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     if (vq == &vr->vq[VIRTIO_RPMSG_RESPONSE] && (out || in != 1)) {
> > > > 
> > > > This in != 1 looks like a dependency on a specific message layout.
> > > > virtio spec says to avoid these. Using iov iters it's not too hard to do
> > > > ...
> > > 
> > > This is an RPMsg VirtIO implementation, and it has to match the 
> > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c 
> > > driver, and that one has specific VirtIO queue and message usage patterns.
> > 
> > That could be fine for legacy virtio, but now you are claiming support
> > for virtio 1, so need to fix these assumptions in the device.
> 
> I can just deop these checks without changing anything else, that still would 
> work. 
> I could also make this work with "any" layout - either ignoring any left-over 
> buffers or maybe even getting them one by one. But I wouldn't even be able to 
> test 
> those modes without modifying / breaking the current virtio-rpmsg driver. 
> What's 
> the preferred solution?

Could you elaborate a bit please?

Thanks
Guennadi
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to