On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:52:19PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> In vhost_vdpa ioctl SET_BACKEND_FEATURES path, currect code
> would try to acquire vhost dev mutex twice
> (first shown in vhost_vdpa_unlocked_ioctl), which can lead
> to a dead lock issue.
> This commit removed mutex operations in vhost_set_backend_features.
> As a compensation for vhost_net, a followinig commit will add
> needed mutex lock/unlock operations in a new function
> vhost_net_set_backend_features() which is a wrap of
> vhost_set_backend_features().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan....@intel.com>

I think you need to squash these two or reorder, we can't first
make code racy then fix it up.

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index b45519ca66a7..e03c9e6f058f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2591,14 +2591,12 @@ void vhost_set_backend_features(struct vhost_dev 
> *dev, u64 features)
>       struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>       int i;
>  
> -     mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>       for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
>               vq = dev->vqs[i];
>               mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
>               vq->acked_backend_features = features;
>               mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>       }
> -     mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_set_backend_features);
>  
> -- 
> 2.18.4

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to