> From: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:35 PM
> 
> On 2021/1/4 上午11:31, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >   static int __init vdpasim_net_init(void)
> >   {
> >     int ret = 0;
> > @@ -176,6 +264,8 @@ static int __init vdpasim_net_init(void)
> >
> >     if (default_device)
> >             ret = vdpasim_net_default_dev_register();
> > +   else
> > +           ret = vdpasim_net_mgmtdev_init();
> >     return ret;
> >   }
> >
> > @@ -183,6 +273,8 @@ static void __exit vdpasim_net_exit(void)
> >   {
> >     if (default_device)
> >             vdpasim_net_default_dev_unregister();
> > +   else
> > +           vdpasim_net_mgmtdev_cleanup();
> >   }
> >
> >   module_init(vdpasim_net_init);
> > -- 2.26.2
> 
> 
> I wonder what's the value of keeping the default device that is out of the
> control of management API.

I think we can remove it like how I did in the v1 version. And actual vendor 
drivers like mlx5_vdpa will likely should do only user created devices.
I added only for backward compatibility purpose, but we can remove the default 
simulated vdpa net device.
What do you recommend?
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to