With one worker we will always send the scsi cmd responses then send the
TMF rsp, because LIO will always complete the scsi cmds first which
calls vhost_scsi_release_cmd to add them to the work queue.

When the next patches adds multiple worker support, the worker threads
could still be sending their responses when the tmf's work is run.
So this patch has vhost-scsi flush the IO vqs on other worker threads
before we send the tmf response.

Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.chris...@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/scsi.c  | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  6 ++++++
 drivers/vhost/vhost.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
index 46f897e41217..96462032a972 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
@@ -1168,12 +1168,23 @@ static void vhost_scsi_tmf_resp_work(struct vhost_work 
*work)
 {
        struct vhost_scsi_tmf *tmf = container_of(work, struct vhost_scsi_tmf,
                                                  vwork);
-       int resp_code;
+       int resp_code, i;
+
+       if (tmf->scsi_resp == TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE) {
+               /*
+                * When processing a TMF, lio completes the cmds then the
+                * TMF, so with one worker the TMF always completes after
+                * cmds. For multiple worker support, we must flush the
+                * IO vqs that do not share a worker with the ctl vq (vqs
+                * 3 and up) to make sure they have completed their cmds.
+                */
+               for (i = 1; i < tmf->vhost->dev.num_workers; i++)
+                       vhost_vq_work_flush(&tmf->vhost->vqs[i + 
VHOST_SCSI_VQ_IO].vq);
 
-       if (tmf->scsi_resp == TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE)
                resp_code = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FUNCTION_SUCCEEDED;
-       else
+       } else {
                resp_code = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FUNCTION_REJECTED;
+       }
 
        vhost_scsi_send_tmf_resp(tmf->vhost, &tmf->svq->vq, tmf->in_iovs,
                                 tmf->vq_desc, &tmf->resp_iov, resp_code);
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 3cc1196d465b..345ade0af133 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -300,6 +300,12 @@ bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_has_work);
 
+void vhost_vq_work_flush(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
+{
+       vhost_work_dev_flush_on(vq->worker);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_work_flush);
+
 void vhost_vq_work_queue(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_work *work)
 {
        vhost_work_queue_on(work, vq->worker);
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
index 56a6806be8f6..973889ec7d62 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct vhost_poll {
 void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn);
 void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work);
 bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev);
+void vhost_vq_work_flush(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq);
 void vhost_vq_work_queue(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_work *work);
 
 void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to