在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
This commit implements a MSIX vector allocation helper
for vqs and config interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan....@intel.com>
---
  drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
index d1a6b5ab543c..44c89ab0b6da 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
@@ -58,14 +58,45 @@ static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, 
int queues)
        ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
  }
+/* ifcvf MSIX vectors allocator, this helper tries to allocate
+ * vectors for all virtqueues and the config interrupt.
+ * It returns the number of allocated vectors, negative
+ * return value when fails.
+ */
+static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
+{
+       struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
+       struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
+       int max_intr, ret;
+
+       /* all queues and config interrupt  */
+       max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
+       ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | 
PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
+
+       if (ret < 0) {
+               IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
+               return ret;
+       }
+
+       if (ret < max_intr)
+               IFCVF_INFO(pdev,
+                          "Requested %u vectors, however only %u allocated, lower 
performance\n",
+                          max_intr, ret);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
  static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
  {
        struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
        struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
-       int vector, i, ret, irq;
+       int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
        u16 max_intr;
- /* all queues and config interrupt */
+       nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
+       if (!(nvectors > 0))
+               return nvectors;


Why not simply checking by using nvectors <= 0? If ifcvf_alloc_vectors can return 0 this breaks the ifcvf_request_irq() caller's assumption.


+
        max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,


So irq is allocated twice here?

Thanks


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to