On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 11:51:27AM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>
> On 3/1/2022 5:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:57:20PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > > Currently we have a BUG_ON() to make sure the number of sg
> > > list does not exceed queue_max_segments() in virtio_queue_rq().
> > > However, the block layer uses queue_max_discard_segments()
> > > instead of queue_max_segments() to limit the sg list for
> > > discard requests. So the BUG_ON() might be triggered if
> > > virtio-blk device reports a larger value for max discard
> > > segment than queue_max_segments().
> > Hmm the spec does not say what should happen if max_discard_seg
> > exceeds seg_max. Is this the config you have in mind? how do you
> > create it?
>
> I don't think it's hard to create it. Just change some registers in the
> device.
>
> But with the dynamic sgl allocation that I added recently, there is no
> problem with this scenario.
Well the problem is device says it can't handle such large descriptors,
I guess it works anyway, but it seems scary.
> This commit looks good to me, thanks Xie Yongji.
>
> Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurto...@nvidia.com>
>
> > > To fix it, let's simply
> > > remove the BUG_ON() which has become unnecessary after commit
> > > 02746e26c39e("virtio-blk: avoid preallocating big SGL for data").
> > > And the unused vblk->sg_elems can also be removed together.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1f23816b8eb8 ("virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support")
> > > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyon...@bytedance.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 10 +---------
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > index c443cd64fc9b..a43eb1813cec 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > @@ -76,9 +76,6 @@ struct virtio_blk {
> > > */
> > > refcount_t refs;
> > > - /* What host tells us, plus 2 for header & tailer. */
> > > - unsigned int sg_elems;
> > > -
> > > /* Ida index - used to track minor number allocations. */
> > > int index;
> > > @@ -322,8 +319,6 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct
> > > blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> > > blk_status_t status;
> > > int err;
> > > - BUG_ON(req->nr_phys_segments + 2 > vblk->sg_elems);
> > > -
> > > status = virtblk_setup_cmd(vblk->vdev, req, vbr);
> > > if (unlikely(status))
> > > return status;
> > > @@ -783,8 +778,6 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > /* Prevent integer overflows and honor max vq size */
> > > sg_elems = min_t(u32, sg_elems, VIRTIO_BLK_MAX_SG_ELEMS - 2);
> > > - /* We need extra sg elements at head and tail. */
> > > - sg_elems += 2;
> > > vdev->priv = vblk = kmalloc(sizeof(*vblk), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > if (!vblk) {
> > > err = -ENOMEM;
> > > @@ -796,7 +789,6 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > mutex_init(&vblk->vdev_mutex);
> > > vblk->vdev = vdev;
> > > - vblk->sg_elems = sg_elems;
> > > INIT_WORK(&vblk->config_work, virtblk_config_changed_work);
> > > @@ -853,7 +845,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > set_disk_ro(vblk->disk, 1);
> > > /* We can handle whatever the host told us to handle. */
> > > - blk_queue_max_segments(q, vblk->sg_elems-2);
> > > + blk_queue_max_segments(q, sg_elems);
> > > /* No real sector limit. */
> > > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, -1U);
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
