On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:05:51PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> x86 maintainers, I think this patch should be carried via the tip tree.

You missed a spot. I'll whack it.

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index a8b323266179..c3ad8a526378 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -16,13 +16,6 @@
 
 extern atomic64_t last_mm_ctx_id;
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
-static inline void paravirt_activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
-                                       struct mm_struct *next)
-{
-}
-#endif /* !CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL */
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdpmc_never_available_key);
 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdpmc_always_available_key);

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to