On 4/12/23 2:56 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >> I can spin another patchset with the single ioctl design so we can compare. > So I'm fine with this approach. One last question, I see this: > > /* By default, a device gets one vhost_worker that its virtqueues share. This > */ > > I'm wondering if it is better to have a vhost_get_worker() to return > the worker_id of a specific queue. In the future, this might be useful > for devices that have multiple workers by default?
Yeah, it would be useful. Just 2 questions. You mean an ioctl command to get this info right? I had added one in one version a while back, but dropped it because for some reason I thought we were going to do a generic vhost sysfs type of interface. We are not doing sysfs right? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
