On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 16:07 +0300, Gavin Li wrote:
> Add interrupt_coalesce config in send_queue and receive_queue to cache user
> config.
> 
> Send per virtqueue interrupt moderation config to underlying device in
> order to have more efficient interrupt moderation and cpu utilization of
> guest VM.
> 
> Additionally, address all the VQs when updating the global configuration,
> as now the individual VQs configuration can diverge from the global
> configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>

FTR, this patch is significantly different from the version previously
acked/reviewed, I'm unsure if all the reviewers are ok with the new
one.

[...]

>  static int virtnet_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
>                               struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
>                               struct kernel_ethtool_coalesce *kernel_coal,
>                               struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
>       struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> -     int ret, i, napi_weight;
> +     int ret, queue_number, napi_weight;
>       bool update_napi = false;
>  
>       /* Can't change NAPI weight if the link is up */
>       napi_weight = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames ? NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT : 0;
> -     if (napi_weight ^ vi->sq[0].napi.weight) {
> -             if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
> -                     return -EBUSY;
> -             else
> -                     update_napi = true;
> +     for (queue_number = 0; queue_number < vi->max_queue_pairs; 
> queue_number++) {
> +             ret = virtnet_should_update_vq_weight(dev->flags, napi_weight,
> +                                                   
> vi->sq[queue_number].napi.weight,
> +                                                   &update_napi);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +
> +             if (update_napi) {
> +                     /* All queues that belong to [queue_number, 
> queue_count] will be
> +                      * updated for the sake of simplicity, which might not 
> be necessary

It looks like the comment above still refers to the old code. Should
be:
        [queue_number, vi->max_queue_pairs]
                        
Otherwise LGTM, thanks!

Paolo

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to