On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:33:34 +0800, Jason Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:24 AM Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:19:34 +0800, Jason Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:16 AM Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 09:13:48 +0800, Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 5:40 PM Xuan Zhuo
> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 15:50:23 +0800, Jason Wang
> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 2:32 PM Xuan Zhuo
> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi, Jason
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could you skip this patch?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm fine with either merging or dropping this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let we review other patches firstly?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will be on vacation soon, and won't have time to do this until
> > > > > > > next week.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have a happly vacation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But I spot two possible "issues":
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) the DMA metadata were stored in the headroom of the page, this
> > > > > > > breaks frags coalescing, we need to benchmark it's impact
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not every page, just the first page of the COMP pages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I think there is no impact.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nope, see this:
> > > > >
> > > > > if (SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER &&
> > > > >
> > > > > !static_branch_unlikely(&net_high_order_alloc_disable_key)) {
> > > > > /* Avoid direct reclaim but allow kswapd to wake */
> > > > > pfrag->page = alloc_pages((gfp &
> > > > > ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) |
> > > > > __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN |
> > > > > __GFP_NORETRY,
> > > > > SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER);
> > > > > if (likely(pfrag->page)) {
> > > > > pfrag->size = PAGE_SIZE <<
> > > > > SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER;
> > > > > return true;
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > The comp page might be disabled due to the SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER and
> > > > > net_high_order_alloc_disable_key.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > YES.
> > > >
> > > > But if comp page is disabled. Then we only get one page each time. The
> > > > pages are
> > > > not contiguous, so we don't have frags coalescing.
> > > >
> > > > If you mean the two pages got from alloc_page may be contiguous. The
> > > > coalescing
> > > > may then be broken. It's a possibility, but I think the impact will be
> > > > small.
> > >
> > > Let's have a simple benchmark and see?
> >
> >
> > That is ok.
> >
> > I think you want to know the perf num with big traffic and the comp page
> > disabled.
>
> Yes.
Hi,
Host:
for ((i=0; i < 10; ++i)) do sockperf tp -i 192.168.122.100 -t 1000 -m
64000& done
Guest:
03:23:12 AM IFACE rxpck/s txpck/s rxkB/s txkB/s rxcmp/s
txcmp/s rxmcst/s %ifutil
03:23:13 AM lo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
03:23:13 AM ens4 61848.00 1.00 3868036.73 0.58
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
tcpdump:
03:25:01.741563 IP 192.168.122.1.29693 > 192.168.122.100.11111:
UDP, length 64000
03:25:01.741580 IP 192.168.122.1.22239 > 192.168.122.100.11111:
UDP, length 64000
03:25:01.741623 IP 192.168.122.1.22396 > 192.168.122.100.11111:
UDP, length 64000
The Guest CPU util is low, every packet is 64000. But the Host vhost process is
100%. So we can not judge by the traffic or the cpu of the Guest.
So I use the kernel without my patches 0635819decaf9d60e6cacfecfebfabe3cbdddafb.
I want to count the frags coalescing num when the comp page is disabled.
$ sh -x test.sh
+ sysctl -w net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=1
net.core.high_order_alloc_disable = 1
+ sysctl net.core.high_order_alloc_disable
net.core.high_order_alloc_disable = 1
+ sleep 5
+ timeout 5 bpftrace -e 'kprobe:
skb_coalesce_rx_frag{@[nsecs/1000/1000/1000]=count()}'
Attaching 1 probe...
+ sysctl -w net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=0
net.core.high_order_alloc_disable = 0
+ sysctl net.core.high_order_alloc_disable
net.core.high_order_alloc_disable = 0
+ sleep 5
+ timeout 5 bpftrace -e 'kprobe:
skb_coalesce_rx_frag{@[nsecs/1000/1000/1000]=count()}'
Attaching 1 probe...
@[356]: 167020
@[361]: 673653
@[359]: 900844
@[360]: 912657
@[358]: 915853
@[357]: 932245
We can see that the skb_coalesce_rx_frag is not called when comp page is
disabled.
If the comp page is enable, there will be many frags coalescing.
So I think that my change will not have impact.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) pre mapped DMA addresses were not reused in the case of
> > > > > > > XDP_TX/XDP_REDIRECT
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Because that the tx is not the premapped mode.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, we can optimize this on top.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I see Michael has merge this series so I'm fine to let it go
> > > > > > > first.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
