On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 03:59:03 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:53:00PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Do you think it's appropriate to push the first two patches of this patch > > set to > > linux 6.6? > > > > Thanks. > > I generally treat patchsets as a whole unless someone asks me to do > otherwise. Why do you want this?
As we discussed, the patch set supporting AF_XDP will be push to net-next. But the two patchs belong to the vhost. So, if you think that is appropriate, I will post a new patchset(include the two patchs without virtio-net + AF_XDP) to vhost. I wish that can be merged to 6.6. Then when the 6.7 net-next merge window is open, I can push this patch set to 6.7. The v1 version use the virtqueue_dma_map_single_attrs to replace virtqueue_dma_map_page_attrs. But I think we should use virtqueue_dma_map_page_attrs. Thanks. > > -- > MST > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
