Hello, Is it possible to indicate an order of preference for a set of alternative matches ( unions )? We have found that explicit order is not respected when querying LOD ( however, it does work against Virtuoso 5 ). Is this a Virtuoso cluster/anytime introduced behaviour or is this how SPARQL is supposed to behave? I have been trying to find some literature on this. I am 90% sure I once relied on the order of the UNION patterns for something similar. But I might be very mistaken.
Thanks, A -- Aldo Bucchi skype:aldo.bucchi http://www.univrz.com/ http://aldobucchi.com/ PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION This message is only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail.
