Hi Hugh.
Yes the build dates are different because the production virtuoso is from
Centos repository and Dev virtuoso is compiled from sourceforge source.
Well I request to the sysadmin upgrade virtuoso but that is the last version
available. And production environment allows only packages from centos
repository for security, stability, support, etc (sysadmin's stuffs).
Production (centos):
[casep@www2 ~]$ virtuoso-t -?
Virtuoso Open Source Edition (multi threaded)
Version 6.1.2.3127-pthreads as of Jan 14 2011
Compiled for Linux (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 1998-2010 OpenLink Software
Dev (Ubuntu server):
cc@toestaCC:/opt$ /opt/virtuoso-cc-hgcl-0.2/bin/virtuoso-t -?
Virtuoso Open Source Edition (multi threaded)
Version 6.1.4.3127-pthreads as of Mar 28 2012
Compiled for Linux (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 1998-2011 OpenLink Software
--
Marcelo Aliquintuy
87433162
El jueves, 17 de enero de 2013 a las 23:43, Hugh Williams escribió:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> The build dates between the production and dev servers are over a year apart,
> thus I would suggest you upgrade the production server to the same build as
> on the dev box ...
>
> What does the out put of running the following command on both report:
>
> virtuoso-t -?
>
> Note also the latest virtuoso open source build can also be compiled from the
> github archive, as based on the build dates of both machine you are not
> running our latest 6.1.6 release, which can be obtained from:
>
> http://www.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/VOSGitUsage
>
> Best Regards
> Hugh Williams
> Professional Services
> OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
> Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
> Twitter -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
> Google+ -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2013, at 22:15, Marcelo Aliquintuy <[email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Im moving to production environment but the virtuoso thats provide Centos
> > have different behavior that dev environment.
> >
> > example:
> >
> > === dev ===
> >
> > PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
> > PREFIX cc: <http://www.toeska.cl/ns/contentcompass/ontology/v1.0#>
> > select ?facetItem ?facetLabel ?facetItemValue
> > FROM <urn:contentcompass:graph:facet>
> > where {
> > ?facetItem rdfs:label ?facetLabel .
> > ?facetItem rdf:type cc:FacetItem .
> > optional{ ?facetItem cc:facetItemValue ?facetItemValue} .
> > optional{ ?facetItem cc:hasAttribute ?facetAttribute} .
> > optional{ ?facetAttribute cc:name ?name} .
> > optional{ ?facetAttribute cc:value ?value} .
> > FILTER (?facetItem
> > in(<http://www.toeska.cl/ns/contentcompass/ontology/time/v1.0#1872>))
> > }
> > order by ?facetLabel
> > LIMIT 1
> >
> > result set:
> >
> > facetItem
> > facetLabel
> > facetItemValue
> >
> > http://www.toeska.cl/ns/contentcompass/ontology/time/v1.0#1872
> > "1872"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
> >
> >
> > ok, one result is ok
> >
> > === Production ====
> >
> > Run the same query and result set empty, too bad!
> >
> > But if i modify the query, grouping all optional like that
> >
> > PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
> > PREFIX cc: <http://www.toeska.cl/ns/contentcompass/ontology/v1.0#>
> > select ?facetItem ?facetLabel ?facetItemValue
> > FROM <urn:contentcompass:graph:facet>
> > where {
> > ?facetItem rdfs:label ?facetLabel .
> > ?facetItem rdf:type cc:FacetItem .
> > optional{ ?facetItem cc:facetItemValue ?facetItemValue .
> > ?facetItem cc:hasAttribute ?facetAttribute .
> > ?facetAttribute cc:name ?name .
> > ?facetAttribute cc:value ?value} .
> > FILTER (?facetItem
> > in(<http://www.toeska.cl/ns/contentcompass/ontology/time/v1.0#1872>))
> > }
> > order by ?facetLabel
> > LIMIT 1
> >
> > result set:
> >
> > facetItem
> > facetLabel
> > facetItemValue
> >
> > http://www.toeska.cl/ns/contentcompass/ontology/time/v1.0#1872
> > 1872
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Nice, i got almost the same data. Two things wear here, different behavior
> > and different literal representation
> > "1872"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> vs just 1872
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Virtuoso versions below, the data was restore from same backup. Have any
> > configuration in virtuoso.ini thats explain this differences
> > Production Centos:
> > OpenLink Virtuoso Server
> > Version 06.01.3127-pthreads for Linux as of Jan 14 2011
> > Started on: 2013/01/17 18:31 GMT-180
> >
> > Dev:
> >
> > OpenLink Virtuoso Server
> > Version 06.01.3127-pthreads for Linux as of Mar 28 2012
> > Started on: 2013/01/14 18:20 GMT-180
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
> > --
> > Marcelo Aliquintuy
> > 87433162
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET (http://ASP.NET), C# 2012,
> > HTML5, CSS,
> > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
> > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
> > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712_______________________________________________
> > Virtuoso-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > (mailto:[email protected])
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
>
>
> Adjuntos:
> - smime.p7s
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and
much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow -
350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
