Hi Henrik,

Glad to hear you have solved the problem.

As the Virtuoso Jena and RDF4J provider use the Virtuoso JDBC Driver for 
connecting to the Virtuoso Server you can pass any of the connect string 
options of the JDBC driver, one of which is "/TIMEOUT=<timeout_secs>",  to the 
providers as detailed at:

        http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/jdbcurl4mat/

Best Regards
Hugh Williams
Professional Services
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers



> On 22 Nov 2017, at 12:28, Henrik Schmidt <h...@informatik.uni-kiel.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hugh,
> 
> Problem solved, I had to call new virtGraph = VirtGraph() for each query
> and not only once.
> Before I only called VirtuosoQueryExecutionFactory.create(sparql,
> virtGraph) in each query, using the same virtGraph.
> 
> A partially related question :
> 
> How do I properly use query timeouts for both jena and rdf4j providers
> to prevent sparql queries running a very long time on large database.
> Is there a good documentation ? I'm inexperienced and just learning.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Henrik
> 
> Hugh Williams schrieb am 22.11.2017 um 13:19:
>> Hi Henrik,
>> 
>> Can you please provide more detailed example jena3 & rdf4j sample code 
>> demonstrating how you are seeking to use both such that we can obtain a 
>> better understanding of the apparent concurrent query execution problem ?
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> Hugh Williams
>> Professional Services
>> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>> Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>> Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>> Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
>> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
>> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 22 Nov 2017, at 08:05, Henrik Schmidt <h...@informatik.uni-kiel.de> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Hugh,
>>> 
>>> the problem is that the jena code is blocking while executing whereas the 
>>> rdf4j code is non blocking and does allow multiple simultaneous queries.
>>> 
>>> So I'm looking for a non blocking jena solution. Is there any ?
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Jenrik
>>> 
>>> Am 22.11.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Hugh Williams:
>>>> Hi Henrik,
>>>> 
>>>> The jena code can be simplified to the following to give an equivalent 
>>>> execution to rdf4j:
>>>> 
>>>> String query = "select .....";
>>>> VirtuosoQueryExecution vqe = VirtuosoQueryExecutionFactory.create(query, 
>>>> virtGraph);
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Hugh Williams
>>>> Professional Services
>>>> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>>>> Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>>>> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>>>> Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>>>> Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
>>>> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
>>>> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 21 Nov 2017, at 14:56, Henrik Schmidt <h...@informatik.uni-kiel.de> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> what is a comaparable jena provider query to this rdf4j provider query ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> TupleQuery tupleQuery =
>>>>> connection.prepareTupleQuery(QueryLanguage.SPARQL, query);
>>>>> 
>>>>> I want to use the jena provider instead and I'm using this threaded so
>>>>> it must be connection based.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My current jena implementation is using something like this :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Query sparql = QueryFactory.create(query);
>>>>> VirtuosoQueryExecution vqe =
>>>>> VirtuosoQueryExecutionFactory.create(sparql, virtGraph);
>>>>> 
>>>>> This will block the port (1111) until completed whereas the rdf4j code
>>>>> can handle multiple parallel queries.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Henrik
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Virtuoso-users mailing list
>>>>> Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
>>> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users

Reply via email to