On Wednesday 01 March 2006 17:39, Thomas Härtl wrote: > > Though my visdn setup still isn't working (yes, Daniele ethereal is on > its way...), I still don't know how to set up visdn.conf and > extensions.conf in terms of how asterisk deals with the same MSN given > in the visdn1.0 and visdn1.1 entries
Your visdn.conf is ok. > [visdn1.0_in] > > exten => 1234,1,macro,ruf|SIP|10 > > [visdn1.1_in] > > exten => 1234,1,macro,ruf|SIP|10 This is ok. Please note that those two contexts are only meaningful for inbound calls. Outbound calls don't need a context. If you want to balance outgoing calls between two (or more) interfaces you have to configure line hunting as follows: visdn.conf: [huntgroup:telco] mode = sequential members = visdn1.0, visdn1.1 extensions.conf: exten => ._,1,macro,ruf|VISDN|huntgroup:telco|10 > Right now both ports arrive at the same SIP extension, but I might want to > change this in the future due to work-load-reasons with my secretary. You can route the calls to two different SIP extensions, however, it is the network which implements the hunting policy. If the network uses sequential hunting, the second port will only receive calls when all the channels in the first port are busy, if the network uses cyclic hunting, the calls will be spread among the two ports. > Can * keep the ports apart even when having the same MSN assigned to it? Could you make an example on what you mean by "keeping ports apart" ? Bye, _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
