[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > could anybody enlighten me what is the difference between vISDN, mISDN, > bristuff and others? (architecture, stability, features) Right we use > mISDN with asterisk with HFC BRI cards but it seems to be far from > mature and usable in production systems. > > Does vISDN have similar features as mISDN?
Yup, it has bugs aswell. What other features does mISDN have? > I don't want to start a flame war, just technical arguments :) Oh, sorry. mISDN started out as a clean rewrite of Linux kernel ISDN support, but seems completely stalled now. They never recovered from being removed from the 2.6 kernels again and isdn4linux being re-introduced. You have your experience already. chan_capi should work on top of mISDN for the low cost HFC-S cards, but from my tests it doesn't make things better. bristuff requires heavy patching to asterisk, but for HFC-S cards there exists patches again to make that useable. It also builds libpri and zaptel by default, which I wouldn't need. So I found it too complicated. Maybe ok for an installation, but think of updates. vISDN is actively developed and supported and has nice debugging features. It's also officially approved to use in public networks. There are some issues not quickly fixed/fixable, like some echo or this delay issue (read recent messages). But vISDN echo uncancelled is not worse than with mISDN and their echo cancel enabled. Give it a try. Tobias _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
