On Monday 13 March 2006 11:57, James Harper wrote: > > Any reason why lapd and kfifo are not prefixed by 'visdn_'?
Because it is a generic module not strictly bound to visdn, as lapd is a standalone module not bound to visdn core. > It seems a bit of a waste that visdn_configurator loads the hardware > drivers when the ones that are required should have been loaded > automatically by the operating system Yes, you're right. Modules management should be done by the operating system through hotplug, unfortunately this is quite distro-dependent, so I'm still indagating how to do that in the best way. Configuration should also be handled by hotplug (now udev) but the same distro-specific issues arise. visdn_configurator is just a quick hack to allow an initial configuration but it's not definitive at all. Ciao, -- Daniele Orlandi _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
