You could try for Meetecho. But I don't know if they would have the
resources for you.
Thanks,
Paul
On 10/27/15 4:32 PM, nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com wrote:
I posted a reply, but do not know if it made it to the list.
Sorry for the no remote. I had heard from only one remote participant so I was
just going to skype him in.
But looks like there is more interest. So will figure out how to get people in.
Will post to list.
Thanks for the comments!
Nalini Elkins
Inside Products, Inc.
www.insidethestack.com
(831) 659-8360
----- Original Message -----
From: John C Klensin <john-i...@jck.com>
To: nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com
Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Final Agenda / Room Assignment : Remote Hub Bar BOF
This note does not seem to specify details for remote
participation in the remote hub discussion. Much as I would
welcome the extra sleep, dare I suggest that not having
arrangements for remote participation in this discussion would
be, at best, a little ironic?
john
--On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 13:30 +0000
nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com wrote:
Vmeet,
This is the room assignment and final agenda for the Bar BOF
in Yokohama to discuss the idea of Remote Hubs. It will be
in Room 419 but the time will be Thursday, Nov. 5th
7:45am-8:45am. Calendar file attached. Breakfast will NOT
be provided. (Sorry!) Please let me know any questions
you may have. Agenda
------
1. We come up with some templates for remote hubs in our
meeting 2. We have some goals for remote hubs for IETF95.
For example: U.S. : 5 hubs Latin / South America: 5
hubs India : 5 hubs ... etc.
A hub can decide which remote hub template they want to use.
3. Sister hubs : hub-to-hub interaction. Should this be
done, if so, how? 4. We do an I-D describing our thoughts (due
date: Jan. 1st, 2016) 5. We post the I-D on the IETF
discussion list for comments. (Due date: Jan 10, 2016) 6.
We try to meet our goals for remote hubs! (Due date:
February 15, 2016) Issues---------
1. Many people cannot afford to attend IETF meetings live.
2. It can be more interesting and useful to attend remote
meetings as a group. The face-to-face (F2F) interaction adds
a great deal to the overall process. 3. Some regions (Latin
America, India) have already started remote hubs. We can
learn from each other. 4. We are starting Regional
Mentoring. Such mentors can work with remote hubs. Thanks,
Nalini ElkinsInside Products, Inc.www.insidethestack.com(831)
659-8360
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
