Hi all, 

we’re learning about Remote Hubs (how to organize them, the impact, the tools, 
etc.). It’s still work in progress... that’s why each one is different and each 
of us may have different ideas and expectations.  

more below

> On 3/23/17, 2:12 AM, "vmeet on behalf of Alissa Cooper" 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of 
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> Alissa:
>  
> Hi!
>  
> Responding from the LATAM point of view.  I’m cc’ing Christian explicitly 
> because he may have more information.
>  
>  
> I have reviewed the drafts about remote hubs and I have a few questions for 
> those who have been involved in them to date. I have not been tracking this 
> closely until now so I appreciate your help in getting me up-to-speed.
>  
> 1) Has there been any tracking of the activity in remote hubs? E.g., the 
> names of people who show up or how many people show up per hub and for which 
> WG sessions? If not, is there a sense of whether those organizing remote hubs 
> would be open to tracking such data and sharing it with the IAOC and 
> secretariat so that we can build a consistent picture over time of how 
> participation is evolving globally at these hubs?
>  
> Yes.  In general we’ve encouraged the hubs to “sign the blue sheet”, and in 
> some cases have even submitted some of them (specially at the first hub 
> experiment in Hawaii).  Of course, ymmv.   On line blue sheets would be ideal.
>  
> Encouraging official registration as  remote participant I think helps the 
> IAOC/secretariat already.
>  
>  
> 2) For hubs that have been available for multiple meetings in the same 
> locations, does it tend to be the case that the same folks show up time and 
> again (for the same or similar working groups), or is there a lot of turnover 
> from meeting to meeting?
>  
> I think we’ve had the opposite experience than Vinayak: remote hubs based in 
> academia have been the most consistent, mostly in topics/WGs.
>  
>  
> 3) Have remote hubs been used for participation in interim meetings or 
> virtual interim meetings?
>  
> Not as far as I know.
>  
> 4) Other than on the existing dedicated hub lists and the remote hubs page on 
> ietf.org <http://ietf.org/>, how/where is the existence of remote hubs 
> advertised? Any other local lists?
>  
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
and we also encourage the local organizers to promote their hubs among their 
contacts or local mailing lists.

>  
>  
> 5) I see the remote hubs page for IETF 98 listed at 
> <https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/doku.php?id=98remotehubs 
> <https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/doku.php?id=98remotehubs>>,
>  but for some past meetings I see these listed in different places on the 
> meeting wiki, or not listed at all. Am I correct that there has not been a 
> consistent URL for the remote hubs list?
>  
> Yes.  It’s still work in progress.  Christian gets better every time! J

Nowadays is made by hand with some google forms + copy & paste to the wiki. 

We'll try to have something better for the next meeting.  
If someone is willing to help, please Join Codesprint  
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF98SprintSignUp 
<https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF98SprintSignUp>
>  
> 6) Have any remote hubs on academic or corporate campuses been used for 
> participants to connect during non-business hours (e.g., late at night)? How 
> have people dealt with getting building access off-hours? Has this been a 
> barrier to getting hubs setup in locations where there was demand from a 
> group of people to join a meeting off-hours?
>  
> Yes.  Yes, time difference is the most obvious barrier to remote hubs.

We do not promote remote hubs when the time difference is not appropriate 
(there were no remote hubs in LAC for Seoul and there are no remote hubs in 
Africa scheduled for Chicago. The rationale is that the objective is to improve 
the experience for remote participants and moving during the night is the 
oposite. 

Christian 

>  
>  
> Alvaro.
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

Reply via email to