Hi. I will not be in Prague, but would be happy to participate remotely, if that is possible, in whatever you decide to do.
Joly's observations about the ICANN experience reinforces my impressions and things I've been saying for some time: remote observation hubs, pre- or post-meeting summary efforts, between meeting local activities, etc., are great ideas and likely to be helpful, but remote hubs for active participation during a meeting are likely to be too complex for participants and operations, too much of a problem for WG chairs and others to manage well, and problematic from the perspective of openness, fairness, and transparency of the IETF to be a good idea... at least until we have a lot of other issues sorted out. best, john --On Monday, July 10, 2017 15:42 -0400 Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there interest in getting together at IETF 99 to discuss > remote hubs and local communities and related activities? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
