At 10:54 AM 4/4/00 -0400, Jordan Henderson wrote: >From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>At 10:43 AM 4/4/00 -0400, Jordan Henderson wrote: >> >> >Embedding VMSPIPE.COM in VMS.C and writing it out as needed? Deja vu! >> >>Hey, the build process writes out code left and right. Why not do it at >>runtime too? As a backup, mind, so we can fix the default version on the >>fly, but still... > >Charles (Lane) began the implementation of VMSPIPE.COM by writing it out from >VMS.C and was convinced by Charles (Bailey) that this was not best. Ah. Well, I guess I haven't been paying enough attention... Sounds like a good "Don't *do* that" message is the way to go... Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Charles Bailey
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Charles Lane
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Jordan Henderson
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Dan Sugalski
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Jordan Henderson
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Charles Lane
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Jordan Henderson
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Carl Friedberg
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Charles Lane
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Charles Lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Charles Bailey
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 Charles Lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 PVHP
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 PVHP
- RE: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 PVHP
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 PVHP
