On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Charles Lane wrote:

> > At 11:17 AM 9/5/2000 -0700, Peter Prymmer wrote:
> > >So now that the deadline pressure is off, would anyone object to making
> > >vmspipe a little more optional rather than a required part of the build?
> ...
> > It seems to me worth noting that the extra lines in the test output, though
> > they certainly look bad, don't appear to cause the tests to fail.  Could
> > there not just be something quirky about a subprocess talking to another
> > subprocess talking to a parent process whose output is a terminal device and
> > whose messaging is turned off?  I still think we shoudl fix it if we can
> > nail down what's causing it, but I'm not convinced that you're better off
> > without the piping mods just because the test output looks flaky.
> 
> To add some more data: on a system that has the extra LF's:
>     $ MMS TEST
> will produce the LF's (same ones that Peter sees).
> 
> But:
>     $ @[.vms]test ".exe" 1
> doesn't have extra LF's.  Both were run as batch jobs so SYS$ERROR
> output would go to the log file.
> 
> To compare results so far:
>  Who    system              compiler            make            result
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prymmer ?                   ?                   ?               LF's

make that line read:

 Prymmer VMS/AXP 7.1          DECC V6.0-001       MMS V3.3-4      LF's

> Lane    VMS/AXP 6.2-1H3     DECC V5.5-002       MMK 3.8-1       ok
> Lane    VMS/AXP 7.1         DECC V5.7-004       MMS 3.0-05      LF's
> Berry   VMS/AXP 7.1         DECC V5.2           ?               ok
> 
> Please feel free to fill in data for the ?'s.
> 
> Right now, it's looking like the extra LF's might be a MMK/MMS thing
> (i.e., subprocess termination writes an EOF to its SYS$ERROR, MMS
> picks gets the EOF in a MBX and writes as an empty record while MMK just
> ignores the EOF?)

Hmm... interesting.

I have been working on adding 'ok','okfile','nok' and 'nokfile' targets
to descrip_mms.template.  Unfortunately I find it somewhat difficult to
deal with an interactive script under the stated MMS /ident.  I have
yet to try playing with a DEFINE/USER SYS$COMMAND thing yet though
(unfortunately my DECset docs have gone missing).

> More tests underway...

I may have an opportunity to try mmk at some point.

Peter Prymmer


Reply via email to