> I was just wondering if C<$h->name !~ /localhost/i> was too lax in that it
> would accept the FQDN and I was wondering if it might have been better to
> have written:
>
> print "not " if $h->name ne "localhost" or $h->name ne "LOCALHOST";
>
> but if $h->name eq "localhost.FORTE.COM" is acceptable then as patched the
> test seems ok on OS/390 and VMS. Thanks for the reply and it looks like
> we won't need to use Jarkko's more extensive regular expression.
There's a difference between 'test passes' and 'a more rigorous test passes'.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
