At 4:42 PM -0800 2/14/01, Peter Prymmer wrote: >On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote: > >> I'd appreciate testing and/or comments before sending this along to p5p. > >It looks good to me. Thanks. >We seem to have a few back patches for configure.com >piling up: Charles Lane's fix for the PERL_REVISION='' thing Hmm. I'd forgotten about that. > plus the extra_pods.com and ccname >work that I wanted to get in, I thought these had gone to p5p. > plus your request for cf_by and perladmin >overridability, plus the DOWN_LOGICAL_NAME_NOT_LIKELY test workaround. That'd be nice, but I don't think I'll get around to implementing anything real soon. Also, we have the following macros which should be tested for and either undef'd or defined appropriately: #define Shmat_t $shmattype /**/ #define MEM_ALIGNBYTES $alignbytes #define PHOSTNAME "$aphostname" /* How to get the host name */ #define VAL_O_NONBLOCK #define VAL_EAGAIN #define RD_NODATA >Are >these getting into the vmsperl p4 repository? Er, what's that? I suspect gsar and jhi would appreciate one or two configure.com patches rather than half a dozen little ones. -- ____________________________________________ Craig A. Berry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
