Craig Berry writes:
> At 02:02 PM 10/31/2001 -0500, Charles Lane wrote:
> >Okay here's the next iteration.
> I'm pretty much on board with this in principle. I was about to take it for
> a spin when I noticed that the following hunks roll back recent changes.
> Were these changes causing you problems or was your working copy just out of
> synch?
Out of synch...time to get back in synch, and send out a re-revised patch.
--
Drexel University \V --Chuck Lane
======]---------->--------*------------<-------[===========
(215) 895-1545 _/ \ Particle Physics
FAX: (215) 895-5934 /\ /~~~~~~~~~~~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
