OK then please disregard my patch.
Peter Prymmer
"Craig A. Berry"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com> cc: Gurusamy Sarathy <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/17/2003 10:51
PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure.com:
sig_num, etc.
At 1:58 PM -0500 3/17/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Here is a possible doc patch for config_h.SH. If it is
>decided that this is acceptable (in light of the controversy
>I realize that is not assured) then porting/Glossary ought
>to be re-generated:
Actually SIG_NUM and SIG_NAME in config_h.SH *do* have the 0 at the
end because they are generated from sig_num_init and sig_name_init,
respectively (not from sig_num and sig_name). I believe Jarkko has
already patched Porting/Glossary to reflect what Configure has always
done: sig_num_init and sig_name_init have trailing 0, but sig_num and
sig_name do not.
>- * The last element is 0 to terminate the list with a NULL. This
>- * corresponds to the 0 at the end of the sig_name_init list.
--
________________________________________
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"... getting out of a sonnet is much more
difficult than getting in."
Brad Leithauser
